Provider research with a source trail, a date and explicit limits.
We separate observable product facts from provider claims, keep incomplete profiles out of the publication set and record what still has not been verified.
1. Source hierarchy
We prefer current official product pages, official public Telegram channels, company/legal pages and regulator notices. Third-party review pages can help discover a provider, but they do not replace a first-party source for product terms.
2. Fact versus claim
Delivered through Telegram or the page displays £89/month can be observed. 76% success rate, 1000 pips a month or 90% accuracy are performance claims unless a reproducible methodology independently establishes them. We label those statements accordingly.
3. Dated pricing
Signal providers change coupons and promotions frequently. Pricing is published as a dated research snapshot and readers are directed to the provider’s final checkout for the current direct price.
4. Publication threshold
A profile needs enough current evidence to explain provider identity, markets, delivery format, price context, notable product differences, execution risks and verification steps. A recognizable brand name alone is not enough.
5. Live-room research
Public pages cannot show the whole signal lifecycle. Once an eligible licensed feed is connected, we can measure message anatomy, edits, cancellations, session timing, instrument mix and forwarding latency. We will publish those observations only after collecting a real dated sample.
6. Corrections and freshness
Every researched profile carries a check date. Material factual corrections should be made promptly; a date is not changed merely to make an old page look fresh.